District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Court Cases

Search
  1. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc. (2006)

    Bill K. Felty, B. Kent Felty Law Office, Tulsa, OK, Eddie Dee Ramirez, Ramirez Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, Johnny Clyde Parker, University of Tulsa College of Law, Tulsa, OK, Joe W. McDoulett, Catholic Charities, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 02-CV-0085-CVE-FHM, 02-CV-0979-CVE-FHM
  2. Goettel v. Glenn Berry Mfrs., Inc. (1964)

    This is an action brought pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b), as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Act, to recover back wages. Such an action under the Act may be brought originally either in State or Federal court by the terms of the Act, to-wit:


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Civ. No. 6069
  3. NMP Corp. v. Parametric Technology Corp. (1997)

    The Plaintiff, NMP Corporation ("NMP") is an Oklahoma corporation in the business of manufacturing and designing large mechanical switchboards, mostly for use by the United States Navy. The Defendant, Parametric Technology Corporation ("Parametric"), is a Massachusetts corporation that develops and manufactures software to assist mechanical engineers in product development and manufacturing. The dispute at issue arises out of Parametric's granting of a license to NMP to use Parametric's [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 96-C-116-K
  4. Oral Roberts University v. Anderson (1997)

    James E. Weger, Robert R. Peters, II, Jones Givens Gotcher & Bogan, Tulsa, John M. McClure, Doylestown, PA, Richard D. Judd, Denver, CO, Gary L. Richardson, Keith Allen Ward, Richardson Law Firm, Tulsa, for Travis Anderson, an individual, Metroplex Properties, L.L.C., a Colorado limited liability company, defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 95-CV-583-H
  5. Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc. (2004)

    Before the Court is Defendants' Objection to the Magistrate's Recommendation on Motion to Remand and Motion to Compel Arbitration (# 27). Upon review of the record, the Court concludes the Report should be affirmed in all respects. All dispositive issues have been accorded a de novo review in compliance with FED. R. CIV. P.72 (b).[1]


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 03-CV-359-K(C)
  6. Burrell v. Turner Corp. of Oklahoma, Inc. (1977)

    The Court has for consideration the Motion to Remand filed by the plaintiffs, the briefs in support and opposition thereto, and, having carefully perused the entire file, and, being fully advised in the premises, finds:


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 76-C-568-B
  7. Conoco, Inc. v. OIL, CHEM. & ATOMIC WORKERS (1998)

    J. Patrick Cremin, Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson, Tulsa, OK, William D. Fisher, Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson, Tulsa, OK, for Conoco Inc., a Delaware corporation, plaintiff.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 98-CV-91-C(M)
  8. Cardtoons v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n (1993)

    Shughart, Thomson, & Kilroy, Dennis D. Palmer, Michael P. Allen, Kansas City, MO, and James E. Weger, Gregory K. Frizzell, Jones, Givens, Gotcher & Bogan, Tulsa, OK, for Major League Baseball Players Ass'n.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 93-C-576-E
  9. Sand Springs Home v. Interplastic Corp. (1987)

    Kenny Joe Smith, Chapel, Wilkenson, Riggs, Abney & Henson, Tulsa, Okl., Stanley A. Reigel, Morrison, Hecker, Curtis, Kuder & Parrish, Overland Park, Kan., for defendant, Cessna Aircraft Co.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 86-C-85-B
  10. In Re CFS-Related Securities Fraud Litigation (2003)

    Lowell E. Sachnoff, Jeffrey T. Gilbert, James A. Rolfes, Sachnoff & Weaver Ltd, Chicago, IL, David L. Bryant, Bryant Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, for AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc., Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company, PFL Life Insurance Company, Monumental Life Insurance Company, Bankers United Life Assurance Company, Amerus Life Insurance Company, Blackrock 2001 Term Trust, Inc., Blackrock Strategic Term Trust, Inc., Blackrock Investment Quality Term Trust, Inc., Blackrock Broad Investment [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 99-CV-825-K(J), 00-CV-111-K(J), 99-CV-828-K(J), 00-CV-839-K(J), 99-CV-829-K(J), 99-CV-862-K(J), 99-CV-863-K(J), 99-CV-864-K(J), 99-CV-873-K(J), 00-CV-104-K(J), 00-CV-205-K(J), 99-CV-874-K(J), 00-CV-110-K(J), 99-CV-889-K(J), 99-CV-919-K(J), 00-CV-837-K(J),
  11. Walker v. Ward (1996)

    This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Petitioner (Docket # 41) and Respondent (Docket # 45). A hearing on these motions was held before the Court on May 15, 1996.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 94-C-214-H
  12. Verrett v. SABRE Group, Inc. (1999)

    Steven R Hickman, Frasier Frasier & Hickman, Tulsa, OK, for Duane Verrett, Terri Oden, Carlos A Rodriguez, Frederick Wiley, Kathy Wiley, Leddia M Schaefer, Steve R Swift, Timothy A Yeakey, Joe T Budzisz, Jimmy Patton, Keith Fishback, plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 97-C-782K
  13. In Re Heston Oil Co. (1986)

    Creditor-Appellant Genave Rogers Palmer (Rogers) brought this appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma declaring that an oil and gas lease is not an executory contract or unexpired lease subject to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. ß 365(d)(2).


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 85-C-929-B
  14. United States v. Estate of Davenport (2001)

    Laurence Lindsay Pinkerton, Judith Ann Finn, Pinkerton & Finn, Tulsa, OK, David Wayne Wulfers, James Potts & Wulfers, Inc., Tulsa, OK, Thomas Gene Potts, Tulsa, OK, for Patricia L. Vestal.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 00-CV-92K(J)
  15. Tax & Accounting Software Corp. v. United States (2000)

    Now before the Court are the cross motions for summary judgment of the Plaintiffs, Tax and Accounting Software Corporation, Tim Kloehr and Sheryl Kloehr (collectively referred to as "TAASC") and the Defendant, United States of America (referred to herein as the "IRS").


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 98-CV-363E
  16. Land v. United States (1964)

    Plaintiff brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346. He seeks damages for personal injuries incurred by him when the automobile in which he was riding, as a passenger, was involved in a collision with an automobile driven by James L. Neal, an employee of the government.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Civ. A. No. 5816
  17. Gale v. Great Southwestern Exploration (1984)

    Defendants argue that count 5, alleging violations of § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77l(2), must be dismissed for failure of Plaintiffs to allege facts sufficient to affirmatively show that suit was filed within the limitation period in § 77m. 15 U.S.C. § 77m provides that an action must be brought for a violation of § 77l(2) "within one year after the discovery of the untrue statement, or the omission, or after such discovery should have been made by the exercise of [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 83-C-966-E, 83-C-1037-E
  18. Cherokee Nation v. Nash (2010)

    Alvin Bertram Dunn, Jack McKay, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Sara E. Costello, U.S. Department of Justice, Amber Beth Blaha, Washington, DC, Jonathan Thompson Velie, Velie Law Firm PLLC, Norman, OK, for Defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Case No. 09-CV-52-TCK-PJC
  19. United States v. Williams (2008)

    This matter is before the Court on remand from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals from issuance of its opinion on December 20, 2007, which reversed the conviction of the defendant DeMarco Deon Williams, vacated his sentence and directed that his case be dismissed for violation of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (the "Act"), 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. The Tenth Circuit directed this Court to determine whether the case be dismissed with or without prejudice, by consideration of the following [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 04-CR-167-HDC
  20. Banks v. Gonzales (2006)

    Before the Court are: (1) Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 13), filed June 7, 2005, which requests a permanent injunction and declaratory relief enjoining Defendants from forcing Plaintiffs to comply with the DNA Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-546, 114 Stat. 2726 (Dec. 19, 2000) (codified at, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. § 14135a, as amended by USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, Pub.L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (Oct. 26, 2001), as amended by Justice For All Act of 2004, Pub.L. [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 05-CV-278-TCK-PJC

3 of 25 Page(s)