District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Court Cases

Search
  1. McGraw v. Barnhart (2005)

    Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Alter Orderl Judgment. This Court previously denied Plaintiff's request for attorneys fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Following the denial of Plaintiff's fee request, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court reconsider its prior denial of fees. Plaintiff's attorney currently has four § 406(b) fee requests pending before this Court. The Court heard oral argument on each of the four fee requests on April 27, 2005. After considering the [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 02-CV-55-SAJ
  2. Slover v. Equitable Variable Life Ins. Co. (2006)

    Bobby Leon Latham, Jr., Brian Jack Goree, Latham Stall Wagner Steele & Lehman PC, Tulsa, OK, P. Michael Yancey, Robert G. Methvin, Jr., McCallum Methvin & Terrell PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 06-CV-222-JHP-SAJ
  3. OKLAHOMA CHAP. OF AMER. ACA., PEDIAT. v. Fogarty (2005)

    Louis Werner Bullock, Miller, Keffer & Bullock, Michael Joseph Lissau, Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson (Tulsa), Patricia Whittaker Bullock, Miller, Keffer & Bullock, Robert Murray Blakemore, Miller, Keffer & Bullock, Tulsa, Thomas K Gilhool, Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, James Eiseman, Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (OKAAP), Community Action Project of Tulsa [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 01CV0187-CVE-SAJ
  4. Public Serv. Co. of Okl. v. BLACK & VEATCH (1971)

    The Plaintiff Public Service Company of Oklahoma (Public Service) sued the Defendant Black & Veatch, Consulting Engineers, A Partnership, (Black & Veatch) for damages claiming that one of its turbines was damaged because of the negligence of said Defendant in designing the same. Said Plaintiff had received payments for most but not all of its claimed loss on the turbine from several insurance companies. The case was therefore initially prosecuted by the Plaintiff Public Service alone [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Civ. No. 69-C-51
  5. Cherry v. Barnhart (2004)

    Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff Tresa Faye Cherry ("Cherry") requests judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying her application for supplemental security income benefits ("SSI benefits") under Title XVI, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. of the Social Security Act. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and (3), the parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Any appeal of this order [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 03-CV-156-CL
  6. Squaw Transit Company v. United States (1975)

    James T. Proctor, Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D. C., and Peter A. Fitzpatrick, Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D. C. (Fritz R. Kahn, Gen. Counsel, I.C.C., Washington, D. C., on brief), for defendant, I.C. C.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Civ. A. No. 75-C-82
  7. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Panama-Williams, Inc. (1976)

    The Court has before it for consideration a Motion to Dismiss filed herein by the defendant, Panama-Williams, Inc., (hereinafter Panama-Williams). Defendant asserts as grounds for said motion that: 1.) The Court lacks jurisdiction over the defendant, and 2.) The defendant has not been properly served with process in the action. Defendant does not specify in its Motion or in its brief in support thereof in what particulars the service of process is deficient. The Court cannot determine from the [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 76-C-124-C
  8. McClain v. Southwest Steel Co., Inc. (1996)

    This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant, Southwest Steel Company, Inc. (Docket # 19). The Court granted Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint on June 12, 1996 (styled as "Second Amended Petition"). On June 14, 1996, the Court held a hearing with respect to Defendant's motion.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 95-C-751-H
  9. Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, PLC (2000)

    Richard Mark Eldridge, Thomas E. Steichen, Rhodes, Hieronymus, Jones, Tucker & Gable, Tulsa, OK, James B. Irwin, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read, Hammond & Mintz, LLP, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 96-CV-1004-K (E)
  10. Linn v. Developmental Services of Tulsa, Inc. (1995)

    Now before the Court is the Motion of Defendant, Developmental Services of Tulsa, Inc. ("Defendant"), for summary judgment against the allegation by Plaintiff John Linn ("Plaintiff") that Defendant failed to pay overtime compensation as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (hereinafter "FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 94-C-460-K
  11. US Ex Rel. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc. (1999)

    David Edward Keglovits, Kristin L. Oliver, Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, Roy Morrow Bell, Timothy P. Irving, James W. Stubblefield, Miller Boyko & Bell, San Diego, CA, James M. Sturdivant, Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, for William I. Koch William A. Presley.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 91-CV-763-K
  12. United States v. Revis (1998)

    This matter comes before the Court on a motion and an amended motion to stay imposition of imprisonment pending appeal of the sentence by Defendant Harley Revis (Docket # 50 and Docket # 51). On September 15, 1998, in accordance with applicable law, the Court sentenced Defendant to incarceration for 51 months. Defendant requests the Court to stay this sentence of imprisonment pending his appeal.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 97-CR-163-H
  13. Bishop v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Edmondson (2006)

    Laura Lea Eakens, Gibbs Armstrong Borochoff Mullican & Hart, Timothy P. Studebaker, Phillip Craig Bailey, P. Craig Bailey, Tulsa, OK, N. Kay Bridger-Riley, Bridger-Riley & Associates PC, Jenks, OK, for Plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 04-CV-848-TCK-SAJ
  14. United States v. Rice (2002)

    Defendant was sentenced in this criminal case to 57 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release, and a $10,000.00 fine. [Doc. No. 19]. Each United States Attorney is responsible for taking all actions necessary to collect fines imposed in his district. 28 C.F.R. § 0.171. In carrying out his duty to collect the $10,000.00 fine owed by Defendant, the United States Attorney has issued a garnishment summons to Bank of Oklahoma ("BOK") pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a) and 28 U.S.C. § [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 01-CR-006-001-C
  15. Marshak v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc. (1975)

    Plaintiff, Fannye Rae Marshak, instituted the above styled action seeking damages and an accounting of profits on securities traded in her account by the Defendants, Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc., a brokerage firm, and Robert A. Sanditen, an employee of Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc., the individual broker who was in charge of Plaintiff's margin account. Plaintiff asserts violation of the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to "churning" of [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 74-C-308-C
  16. US Commodity Futures Trading Com'n v. Bradley (2005)

    Gretchen L. Lowe, James Anthony Garcia, Michael William Solinsky, Richard B. Wagner, United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Washington, DC, Kevin Chambers Leitch, United States Attorney's Office, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 05-CV-00062-JHP
  17. Preston v. Edmondson (1967)

    The Court has under consideration plaintiff's motion to remand this case to State Court on the grounds that defendant Ed Edmondson, as a member of the United States House of Representatives, is not an officer of the United States or in the alternative was not acting under color of his office as a member of the United States House of Representatives when he issued a press release regarding certain information furnished to the Fair Campaign Practices Committee, an organization created in 1954 on [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 6598, 6599
  18. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Grant (1998)

    David L. Thomas, Karen Eby, Haswell Jones Hughey Vaughan & Thomas, Oklahoma City, OK, Douglas Nelson Gould, Lyle S. Vaughn, Oklahoma City, OK, Jay Fenton, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Chicago, IL, Alan R. Clever, Resolution Trust Corp, Dallas, TX, for Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 92-C-1043-H
  19. National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States (1973)

    Leonard A. Jaskiewicz and William J. Grove, Washington, D. C., Fred Rahal, Jr., and Charles C. Baker, Tulsa, Okl. (Grove, Jaskiewicz & Gilliam, Washington, D. C., and Gable, Gotwals, Hays, Rubin & Fox, Tulsa, Okl., of counsel, on brief), for plaintiff, National Trailer Convoy, Inc.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: Civ. A. No. 72-C-239
  20. Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd. (1977)

    William Jones and Philip J. Eller, Jones, Givens, Brett, Gotcher, Doyle & Bogan, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., William H. Mattoon, Norman, Okl., James D. Groves, James R. Ryan, James L. Kincaid, Douglas L. Inhofe, Royce H. Savage, Dan A. Rogers and Charles A. Whitebook, Tulsa, Okl., for Maple Leaf Apartments et al., defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Docket: 74-C-119

2 of 25 Page(s)