District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Court Cases

Search
  1. United States v. Davis (1994)

    This matter is before the court on Defendants' challenge to the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841 which operate to enhance the penalties for offenses involving cocaine base. Jones, who has pled guilty and awaits sentencing, argues that the penalty provisions are void for vagueness, or that they are inapplicable by operation of the rule of lenity because there are two statutory penalties for cocaine. Davis, who has offered to plead guilty conditionally, joins in the latter argument. They [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Crim. A. Nos. 1:93-CR-0234-JOF, 1:94-CR-021-JOF
  2. King v. Georgia Power Company (1968)

    This is a class action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 wherein plaintiffs, employees of Georgia Power and members of Local 84, seek injunctive relief and damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq. The factual basis for plaintiffs claim of discrimination is allegedly as follows: (1) Plaintiffs are classified by Georgia Power out of the line of progression in all departments, restricting them to labor posts so as to limit their promotional opportunities. [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. 11723
  3. Gordon v. Willis (1980)

    Susan V. Boleyn, Asst. Atty. Gen., John C. Walden, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Don A. Langham, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert S. Stubbs, III, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. C79-101R
  4. Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. (1993)

    Wade K. Copeland, Webb Carlock Copeland Semler & Stair, Atlanta, GA, Jan Laurence Sadick, Office of J.L. Sadick, Houston, TX, for Rojerio Garcia, Insurance Co. of North America, Koch Services, Inc.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. 4:93-cv-06-HLM
  5. CSX Transp., Inc. v. Georgia Public Serv. Com'n (1996)

    This case is presently before the Court on plaintiff CSX Transportation's (hereinafter "CSX") Motion for Summary Judgment [11], plaintiff Norfolk's Motion for Summary Judgment [14], Transportation Communication Union's (hereinafter "TCU") Motion to Intervene as a Defendant [15], plaintiff CSX's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [21], plaintiff Norfolk's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [24], and defendant Georgia Public Service Commission's (hereinafter "GPSC") Motion for Summary Judgment [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civil No. 1:96-CV-0894-JEC
  6. Savarese v. United States Dept. of Health (1979)

    Drew A. Laughlin and William M. Bowen, Bowen, Cooper, Beard & Smoot, Hilton Head Island, S. C., John J. Dalton and Daniel S. Reinhardt, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. No. C78-243A
  7. National Ass'n of Government Employees v. Barrett (1997)

    Kent B. Alexander, Sharon Douglas Stokes, Office of U.S. Atty. Atlanta, GA, Michael Sitcov, Jennifer E. Kaplan, Frank W. Hunger, Gary G. Grindler, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, DC, for Defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: 1:97-CV-276-RCF
  8. Jones v. Kemp (1989)

    Brandon A. Jones, a/k/a Wilbur May, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons set forth in Parts III, A-H, of this opinion, the court finds petitioner's claims of alleged error during the guilt/innocence phase of his trial to be without merit. For the reasons set forth in Part IV of this opinion, however, the court finds that the state trial court committed constitutional error in the sentencing phase of the petitioner's trial. Accordingly, [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: 1:88-cv-328-CAM
  9. Hayes v. Irwin (1982)

    This diversity action concerns the deterioration of a business relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant and the accompanying feelings of bitter resentment and animosity. The action basically concerns an alleged failure to pay sums owing to the plaintiff, tortious interference with existing and prospective business and contractual relations, and defamation. John Hayes contends (1) that he and William T. Irwin were business partners in a commodities trading venture during 1976, (2) [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. C 77-2027 A
  10. State of Ga., Dept. of Human Resources v. Califano (1977)

    This is an action under Title XIX of the Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 705 and 706. The case arises from a dispute between the State of Georgia Department of Human Resources (DHR) and the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW). The center of the controversy is HEW's refusal to reimburse Georgia for some $3.5 million which was paid by DHR to doctors who had provided services to [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: C76-543A
  11. Diamond Power Intern., Inc. v. Davidson (2007)

    These cases come before the Court on Defendant Wayne Davidson's Motion for Summary Judgment [68] in Case No. 1:04-CV-0091-RWS-CCH and Defendant Clyde Bergemann's Motion for Summary Judgment [210] in Case No. 1:04-C1708-RWS-CCH. After reviewing the entire record, the Court enters the following Order.[1]


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civil Action Nos. 1:04-CV-0091-RWS-CCH, 1:04-CV-1708-RWS-CCH
  12. Crow v. Brown (1971)

    The City of Atlanta is a fair and progressive city which, despite its wealth, growth, and physical beauty, is beset by the same deep-seated and long-range problems that are found in most American cities today. Atlanta's slums are the root-cause of many of these problems. From these jugs of wrath emanate much of the city's crime, drug addiction, unemployment, and racial unrest.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 14954, 15203
  13. Buford v. American Finance Company (1971)

    The question in these consolidated cases is whether defendants have violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (1970), by disclosing a notary fee of $1.00 as a separate item on their small loan disclosure statements instead of including the fee in the "finance charge" and "annual percentage rate." The court finds that they have, and that plaintiffs are entitled to recover the statutory penalty imposed by 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (1970).[1]


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 14638-14642, 14660, 14661, 14859, 14860
  14. Peacock v. Retail Credit Company (1969)

    This suit for libel, and for invasion of the right of privacy, is presently under a stay order, being continued by this court until the issuance of a further order upon pending discovery matters. The court's stay order stated that it would consider defendant's motion for summary judgment after the discovery ruling. However, the court's view of the law controlling the case enables the court to pass on all motions simultaneously, and it hereby grants defendant's motion for summary judgment and [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. 11597
  15. McCleskey v. Zant (1984)

    Robert H. Stroup, Atlanta, Ga., Jack Greenberg, John Charles Boger, New York City, Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., Anthony G. Amsterdam, N.Y. University Law School, New York City, for petitioner.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. C81-2434A
  16. Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. (2001)

    Hubert E. Hamilton, III, The Hamilton Firm, Rossville, GA, Andrew W. Hutton, Hutton & Hutton, Wichita, KS, Edward H. Kellogg, Jr., Steven W. Saccoccia, Daniel Wayne Sigelman, Kellogg Saccoccia & Sigelman, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff in No. 1:95cv00965.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: CIV.A.195-CV-965TWT, CIV.A.195-CV-3068TWT
  17. United States v. Buffington (1995)

    The captioned case is before the court for interpretation of a recently amended statute affecting the sentencing of individuals convicted of certain specified federal drug offenses. Other issues objected to in defendant's presentence report will be addressed at defendant's sentencing.


    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Crim. No. 2:94-cr-6-WCO
  18. Taylor v. Bear Stearns & Co. (1983)

    This action, brought under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA), the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and which has several state theories, is before the court on defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). This court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 27 of the SEA, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa; Sections 1331 and 1332 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332; and pursuant to the [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. C82-2059A
  19. Harvey v. Cobb County, Ga. (1993)

    This case requires the Court to decide whether a framed panel of the Ten Commandments and the so-called Great Commandment displayed in a county court-house building violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. That decision affects not only the litigants in this case but more broadly our concept of full religious freedom — to believe or not to believe, to participate or not to participate, as one pleases — and whether we truly insist, as did [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. A. No. 1:92-cv-45-MHS
  20. Broadcast Corp. of Georgia v. Broadfoot (1985)

    This matter is now before the court on appeal from the order and judgment entered by the Honorable William L. Norton, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Georgia. The Trustee for the debtor, Subscription Television of Greater Atlanta ("Subscription TV") appeals Judge Norton's order allowing an administrative claim in favor of Broadcast Corporation of Georgia ("Broadcast") in the amount of $156,166.20. Broadcast appeals from Judge Norton's subsequent order amending [...]

    Court: District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket: Civ. No. C85-2858

1 of 141 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5