District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Court Cases

Search
  1. United States v. Bliss (1987)

    Jill Newman & Joseph Moore, Asst. U.S. Attys., St. Louis, Mo., F. Henry Habicht, II, Steven R. Baer, John R. Barker, Mark E. Grummer, Brian G. Donohue, U.S. Dept. of Justice, James J. Kohanek, U.S. Environmental Prot. Agency, Washington, D.C., Cheryle Micinski, Asst. Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Prot. Agency, Kansas City, Kan., for plaintiff.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 84-200C(1)
  2. Hicks v. St. Mary's Honor Center (1991)

    Plaintiff filed a three-count complaint against defendant St. Mary's Honor Center ("St. Mary's") and defendant Steve Long. Defendant St. Mary's is a minimum security correctional facility operated by the Missouri Department of Corrections and Human Resources ("MDCHR"). Defendant Steve Long was the superintendent of St. Mary's from January 7, 1984 to May 16, 1985. In Count I plaintiff alleges that St. Mary's violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 88-109 C (5)
  3. Maritz, Inc. v. Cybergold, Inc. (1996)

    This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue [document # 18], on the motion of defendant to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction [document # 23], and on the motion of defendant to stay the proceedings [document # 24].


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:96CV01340 ERW
  4. United States v. Clary (1994)

    Defendant Edward Clary was arrested for possession with intent to distribute 67.76 grams of cocaine base. Clary pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base ("crack cocaine"), pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii) (hereinafter referred to as the "crack statute"), punishable by a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years imprisonment. Prior to sentencing, Clary, a black male, filed a motion challenging the constitutionality of the crack statute and contended, inter alia, [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 89-167-CR (4)
  5. Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America Corporation (1971)

    In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages alleged to have been suffered upon breach of express and implied warranties made by defendant seller in connection with plaintiff's purchase of certain welding equipment. Suit was originally filed September 14, 1970, in the Circuit Court of Warren County, Missouri, and removed to this court on defendant's petition. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This matter is presently before the court on defendant's motion for summary judgment. [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 70 C 513(3)
  6. Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. (1980)

    Plaintiffs brought these actions alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to 1144, as well as common law fraud and tortious interference with contractual relations.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 75-701C(2), 76-24C(2)
  7. Liddell v. BD. OF ED. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO. (1980)

    William E. Caldwell, Richard B. Fields, Ratner & Sugarmon, Memphis, Tenn., Charles H. Staples, St. Louis, Mo., Thomas I. Atkins, New York City, Gen. Counsel, NAACP, for plaintiffs-intervenors Caldwell.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 72-100C(C)
  8. Parker v. Swenson (1971)

    Petitioner was convicted in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis of robbery in the first degree by means of a deadly and dangerous weapon. This conviction was reversed by Division No. 2 of the Missouri Supreme Court on September 14, 1970 (459 S.W.2d 241) and the case remanded for hearings on the applicability of the Second Offender Act. Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing was denied on October 12, 1970 and he was returned to the court of original jurisdiction and resentenced on November [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 71 C 246(3)
  9. Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co. (1998)

    James R. Dankenbring, Partner, Francis E. Pennington, III, Partner, Thomas W. Jerry, Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, MO, for Bull Moose Tube Company, Caparo, Inc., Bull Moose Tube, Ltd., Swraj Paul, defendants.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:96CV1095 CDP
  10. United States v. Strauser (2003)

    This child pornography case is one of a number of cases arising from the government's investigation of the "Candyman" web site. The evidence against defendant Gregory Strauser was seized pursuant to a search warrant. The government concedes that the warrant affidavit falsely indicated that Strauser had received emails containing over one hundred images of child pornography, when in fact, there was no evidence that he had ever received any child pornography.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:02CR82CDP
  11. In Re Spirit Holding Co., Inc. (1997)

    This matter is before the Court on the appeal of plaintiff Central Hardware Co. from the final order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denying Central's motion for summary judgment, granting defendant Walker-Williams Lumber Co.'s cross-motion for summary judgment, and dismissing Central's complaint seeking avoidance under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) of a wire transfer replacing an uncashed check issued to defendant Walker-Williams three (3) days prior to the [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:97CV148SNL
  12. Spencer v. Moore (1986)

    On February 18, 1986, plaintiff Randy G. Spencer, an inmate in the Missouri Prison System, filed a complaint in this Court alleging violations of his constitutional rights as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Defendants subsequently moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). This Court did not rule upon defendants' motion but ordered plaintiff to amend his complaint to allege the specific grievances and the actions [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 86-363C(1)
  13. Joseph v. Norman's Health Club, Inc. (1971)

    Plaintiffs in these four related and consolidated cases have filed class actions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules promulgated thereunder, and under the Consumer Protection Act. The cases are presently before the Court on Motions of certain of the defendants to dismiss the amended complaints and motions by other defendants for summary judgment. In addition, certain of the defendants have, by motion, challenged the class action aspect of these cases while the plaintiffs [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 70 C 416(4), 70 C 633(4), 71 C 3(4), 71 C 253(4)
  14. Richardson v. United Parcel Service (1996)

    This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss. Defendant argues that plaintiff lacks standing to prosecute this action and the Court lacks jurisdiction over the case because plaintiff filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in May of 1992 and failed to list this potential cause of action as an asset in the Schedule of Assets and Liabilities filed with the Bankruptcy Court. Defendant also argues that plaintiff should be estopped from maintaining this [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:95CV00863 GFG
  15. James v. Whirlpool Corp. (1992)

    Plaintiffs, former distributors of Whirlpool appliance parts, filed this action against Whirlpool Corporation claiming 1) breach of contract, 2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and 3) interference with a business relationship in connection with a proposed sale of plaintiffs' business. Plaintiffs originally filed this action in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri. Defendant removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. This [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 90-2115-C-5
  16. Universal CIT Credit Corp. v. Farmers Bank of Portageville (1973)

    Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, brings this action against defendant Farmers Bank of Portageville, a Missouri banking corporation. Jurisdiction is founded upon diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: S 71 C 82
  17. Deaconess Health Services Corp. v. Shalala (1995)

    Ronald N. Sutter, Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, P.C., Harry B. Wilson, Husch and Eppenberger, St. Louis, MO, for Deaconess Health Services Corporation dba Deaconess Medical Center Central Campus.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:93 CV 1594 DDN
  18. Bolon v. Rolla Public Schools (1996)

    Robert J. Krehbiel, Evans and Dixon, St. Louis, MO, Thomas A. Mickes, Peter H. Ruger, Celynda L. Brasher, Peper and Martin, St. Louis, MO, for Rolla Public Schools, Robert McKay, D. Kent King, Roger Berkbuegler.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 4:93CV2034 CDP
  19. DOE a v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. Louis County (1986)

    This matter is before the Court on separate motions to dismiss filed by the defendants Special School District of St. Louis County (SSD); David Cerny, a former bus driver for SSD; and 12 individual administrators of SSD.


    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: 85-2801C(1)
  20. Smallwood v. United States (1973)

    This matter came before the Court on the Complaint of the Plaintiff alleging that the Defendants have conspired to deprive him of "liberty and property" in violation of the constitutional protection afforded these civil rights. Plaintiff alleges jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C., Sections 1331, 1343, 1346 and 1361; 18 U. S.C., Section 3231; and 42 U.S.C., Sections 1983 and 1988. In terms of relief, Plaintiff seeks a complete investigation into all court actions in Civil Action No. 69-C-57(2), [...]

    Court: District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Docket: Civ. No. 72 C 635(A)

1 of 132 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5