District Court for the District of South Carolina Court Cases

Search
  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc. (1974)

    Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Fletcher C. Mann, Greenville, S. C., Parrott, Bell, Seltzer, Park & Gibson, Charles B. Park, III, Charlotte, N. C., Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, David L. Foster, New York City, for The Duplan Corp., The Schwarzenbach-Huber Co., Jonathan Logan, Inc., Frank Ix & Sons Virginia Corp., Lawrence Texturing Corp., and United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 71-306, 70-968, 69-1096, 68-705, 69-777, 70-14, 70-189, 70-250, 70-295, 70-358, 70-385, 70-386, 70-391, 70-493, 70-622, 70-628, 70-677, 70-683, 71-87 to 71-102, 71-115, 71-126, 71-127 and 71-283
  2. Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1981)

    This matter is before the Court upon the defendants' joint motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The rule provides that summary judgment shall be rendered when the papers offered in support and in opposition thereto "show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." F.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A motion for summary judgment based on sworn affidavits and deposition testimony [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 77-246
  3. Campus Sweater & Sportswear v. MB Kahn Const. (1979)

    G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., West, Bendorf, Cooper & Bowen, Camden, S. C., Terrell Glenn, C. Alan Runyon, McNair, Glenn, Konduros, Corley, Singletary, Porter & Dibble, P. A., Columbia, S. C., for Campus Sweater and Sportswear Co.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 76-0292-5
  4. In Re Ammirati (1995)

    This case is before the court on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court. This court has jurisdiction to review the final judgment of the Bankruptcy Court under 28 U.S.C. Section 158(a). Appellants argue that the Bankruptcy Court erred in discharging the bulk of Appellee's student loan as an "undue hardship" under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B).[1]


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 4:95-337-22
  5. Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Elec. Co. (1993)

    This action is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In their second amended complaint, Plaintiffs, a conglomeration of corporations and their insurers, (collectively, "Myrtle Beach"), assert claims of common law negligence and breach of implied warranty of merchantability pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in South Carolina, see S.C.Code Ann. §§ 36-1-101 to XX-XX-XXX [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: 3:86-1796-21
  6. Heniford v. American Motors Sales Corp. (1979)

    Originally instituted in the Court of Common Pleas for the County of Horry, South Carolina, this action was removed by defendant American Motors Sales Corporation [AMSC] to this Court on February 2, 1979. The circumstances surrounding the removal are far from typical and present what the Court ascertains as a novel question, requiring almost a complete circumspection of the removal provisions for its resolution. The case is presently before the Court on defendant AMSC's motion for an Order [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 79-220
  7. Mizell v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1981)

    William L. Pope, Robinson, McFadden, Moore & Pope, P. A., Columbia, S. C., and Blair C. Fensterstock, Dewey, Ballantine, Bushly, Palmer & Wood, New York City, for defendant, Eli Lilly & Co.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 80-1091-1, 80-1092-1
  8. Dash v. Commanding General (1969)

    Thomas Broadwater. Columbia, S. C., Leonard B. Boudin, Dorian Bowman, New York City, Rabinowitz, Boudin & Standard, New York City, David Rein, Washington, D. C., and Howard Moore, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 69-303
  9. Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (1995)

    Bruce J. Terris, Mark V. Dugan, Terris, Pravlik, & Wagner, Washington, DC, James Stuart Chandler, Jr., South Carolina Environmental Law Project, Pawleys Island, SC, Robert Guild, Columbia, SC, for plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A No. 3:92-1697-17
  10. Drs. Steuer & Latham v. Nat. Med. Enterprises (1987)

    This matter comes before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment on all Counts. The underlying lawsuit raises antitrust and other challenges to a July 1985 contract between Cherokee Memorial Hospital ("CMH") and Dr. Mijanovich (the "Mijanovich Contract") whereby Dr. Mijanovich became the exclusive pathology provider at CMH. The inception of the Mijanovich Contract brought to an end the plaintiffs' longstanding position as the sole pathology providers at CMH. Plaintiffs contend that [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 87-454-3
  11. Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips (1998)

    This is a declaratory judgment and Title VII case involving a former "Hooters Girl," who complains of sexual harassment by Hooter's managers and the brother of the company's CEO. The case is unusual for several reasons. Unlike the party alignment in the typical employment discrimination case, the plaintiff here is the former employer, Hooters of America, Inc. ("hereinafter HOA") and the employee, Ms. Phillips, is the defendant (hereinafter "Phillips"). Second, the case includes both an [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: 4:96-3360-22
  12. Doyle v. United States (1977)

    These cases, consolidated for trial and heard by this court on March 28-31, 1977, arise from an October 9, 1974, collision between a motor boat operated by one John White Fulton, plaintiff-Doyle's decedent, in which plaintiff, Carol Lynn Feaga, was riding, and the guide cable used in the operation of the South Island Cable ferry. The Doyle complaint filed October 9, 1975, sought recovery against the United States and the South Carolina Highway Department, as joint tort-feasors, for the wrongful [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 75-1781, 75-1783
  13. Bob Jones University v. Johnson (1974)

    By complaint filed October 24, 1972 Bob Jones University (hereinafter called Bob Jones), an eleemosynary corporation of the State of South Carolina, and Paul L. Wright, a veteran of service to his country and admittedly entitled to veterans' benefits, seek judicial review of a final determination of that sprawling bureaucracy of the federal government known as the Veterans Administration (hereinafter called VA). On September 12, 1972, an Administrative Law Judge of the Department of Health, [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 72-1325
  14. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc. (1975)

    Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Fletcher C. Mann, Greenville, S. C., Parrott, Bell, Seltzer, Park & Gibson, Charles B. Park, III, Charlotte, N. C., Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher, David L. Foster, New York City, for The Duplan Corp., The Schwarzenbach-Huber Co., Jonathan Logan, Inc., Frank Ix & Sons Virginia Corp., Lawrence Texturing Corp., and United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 71-306, 70-968, 69-1096, 68-705, 69-777, 70-14, 70-189, 70-250, 70-295, 70-358, 70-385, 70-386, 70-391, 70-493, 70-622, 70-628, 70-677, 70-683, 71-87 to 71-102, 71-115, 71-126, 71-127 and 71-283
  15. Driggers v. United States (1970)

    The plaintiffs brought these actions originally against Warren G. Crook in the Court of Common Pleas for Orangeburg County, South Carolina, seeking damages for personal injuries and property damage resulting from a collision on U. S. Highway 301 near Orangeburg on April 23, 1969. Service was effected upon the defendant motorist by serving the State's Chief Highway Commissioner under the substitute service statute applicable to non-resident motorists involved in traffic accidents in South [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 69-740
  16. United States v. Prytz (1993)

    That on or about February 27, 1992, in the District of South Carolina, the Defendant, THOMAS A. PRYTZ, knowingly received one video tape containing seven separate films which had been transported and shipped in commerce, said video tape containing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the production of said visual depictions having involved the use of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Crim. No. 2:92-593
  17. Bowman v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. (1993)

    This matter is currently before the court on the defendant's motion for summary judgment on all of the plaintiff's causes of action, the defendant's alternative motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim plaintiff's action based on inadequate grade crossing warning devices, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on his claim for failure to sound statutorily required warnings. In addition, the plaintiff has moved to have this court reconsider its order of February 26, 1992, in which [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 0:91-3270-12
  18. Hammond v. South Carolina State College (1967)

    Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., and Hemphill P. Pride, II, Columbia, S. C.; Ernest A. Finney, Jr., Sumter, S. C. and Robert L. Carter, Maria L. Marcus, and Lewis M. Steel, New York City, for plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 67-165
  19. Bryant v. Food Lion, Inc. (2000)

    Nicholas W. Clark, Assistant General Counsel, Peter J. Ford, UFCW, Legal Department, Washington, DC, Ian Lanoff, Julia Penny Clark, Bredhoff & Kaiser, Washington, DC, James Lee Bell, The Bell Law Firm, PA, Charleston, SC, for Rickey B. Bryant, Brenda S. Bryant, Chrystal R. Bryant, Stephanie Windham Bryant.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ.A. 2:90-0505-11
  20. United States v. Medical Society of South Carolina (1969)

    Stephen J. Pollak, Asst. Atty. Gen., Maceo W. Hubbard, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Klyde Robinson, U. S. Atty., and Thomas P. Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Charleston, S. C., for the Government.


    Court: District Court for the District of South Carolina Docket: Civ. A. No. 68-671

1 of 74 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5