District Court for the District of New Hampshire Court Cases

Search
  1. Laaman v. Helgemoe (1977)

    This civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerns the living conditions and programs available at the New Hampshire State Prison (NHSP). It is brought by twelve named inmates on behalf of all persons who are or will be incarcerated as duly convicted felons at the prison, including, but not limited to, inmates on work release, in quarantine, punitive segregation, protective custody and on trusty status. The original defendants, sued in both their individual and official [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 75-258
  2. Hoitt v. Vitek (1973)

    These are two civil rights class actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which the plaintiffs seek declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, injunctive relief, and compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged deprivations, under color of State law, of rights secured to them by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3, 4).


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 73-55, 73-67
  3. Garrity v. Gallen (1981)

    The model of democracy adopted for (both federal and state) governance in the United States provides that the legislative branch shall raise and allocate funds necessary for the common good.[1] Not unusually, there are more competitors for a share of such funds than there are funds to be divided. When, as in the instant litigation, a defined group perceives it is being deprived of what it believes to be an "entitlement", litigation ensues. This is more particularly true when such group [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 78-116-D
  4. United States v. Mottolo (1985)

    Douglas J. Miller, Asst. U.S. Atty., Concord, N.H., Elizabeth Yu, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., P. Lynn Peterson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, Mass., for United States.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. Nos. 83-547-D, 84-90-D
  5. Chimento v. Stark (1973)

    This is an action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 wherein plaintiff requested a Three-Judge Court to declare unconstitutional and permanently enjoin the enforcement of Part Second, Article 42, of the New Hampshire Constitution.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 72-182
  6. Skoglund v. Singer Company (1975)

    This action arises under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and concerns an act of alleged age discrimination by defendant against plaintiff on or about August, 1974. Jurisdiction is founded on 29 U.S.C. § 626(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Defendant contests the jurisdiction of this court and has moved to dismiss the case.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 75-212
  7. United States v. Mottolo (1988)

    U.S. Atty. by Susan L. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Concord, N.H., F. Henry Habicht, II, Action Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Yu, Andrew S. Hogeland, Atty. Environmental Enforcement Section Land and Natural Resources Div. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lynn Peterson, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. E.P.A., Boston, Mass., for U.S.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. Nos. 83-547-D, 84-90-D
  8. Puntolillo v. New Hampshire Racing Commission (1974)

    Plaintiff is a driver-trainer of harness horses. Defendants are the New Hampshire Racing Commission (hereinafter NHRC), the regulatory agency which is responsible for horse racing activity in New Hampshire, and the New Hampshire Trotting and Breeding Association, Inc. (hereinafter TBA), which conducts the harness racing activities at Rockingham Park, Salem, New Hampshire. Plaintiff claims that in 1971 and 1972 defendants unlawfully interfered with his employment opportunities by discriminating [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 74-38
  9. Doe v. Friendfinder Network, Inc. (2008)

    The plaintiff, proceeding pseudonymously, has sued defendants Friendfinder Network, Inc. and Various, Inc. on a number of claims arising out of the placement of allegedly false and unauthorized personal advertisements about her on their websites and others. The defendants move to dismiss the plaintiffs claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that they are barred by the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230, and otherwise fail to state a [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civil No. 07-cv-286
  10. Morale v. Grigel (1976)

    This civil rights action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, concerns the suspension of a student of the New Hampshire Technical Institute for possession of marijuana. Plaintiff contends that his suspension was based upon evidence illegally seized from his dormitory room at the Institute on May 23, 1976, in violation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments rights under the United States Constitution. He claims that the evidence should have been excluded from the disciplinary hearing. He also [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 76-211
  11. Appalachian Mountain Club v. Brinegar (1975)

    Frederic K. Upton, Upton, Sanders & Smith, Concord, N. H. Samuel Hoar, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Mass., Harvey D. Carter, Jr., Williams, Witten, Carter & Wickes, Bennington, Vt., for plaintiffs.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 74-208, 74-219
  12. Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC. (2009)

    Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Joseph P. Thomas, Linda E. Maichl, Paul J. Cosgrove, Ulmer & Berne LLP, Cincinnati, OH, Stephen J. Judge, Wadleigh Starr & Peters PLLC, Manchester, NH, for Defendant.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civil No. 08-cv-358-JL
  13. Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc. (1975)

    Plaintiff, a New Hampshire corporation, is a retail automobile dealer engaged in the business of selling new and used Subarus to the consuming public. Defendant Subaru of America, Inc. (Importer), a Pennsylvania corporation having its principal place of business in Pennsauken, New Jersey, is the sole importer and manufacturer's distributor of Subaru motor vehicles in the United States. Defendant Subaru of New England, Inc. (Distributor), a Massachusetts corporation having its principal place of [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 74-119
  14. Abbott v. Moore Business Forms, Inc. (1977)

    Plaintiff has brought an action alleging age discrimination by defendant under 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and has sought further relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1988, alleging that defendants conspired to deprive plaintiff of his civil rights. He has also sought to certify his claim as a class action; this question is not at issue at present. Defendants have moved to dismiss on the grounds that (1) this court lacks subject matter [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 76-82
  15. United States v. ONE 1972 DATSUN (1974)

    This case arises out of the seizure of claimant's Datsun in connection with his arrest for the sale of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (hereinafter LSD), a narcotic drug. The Government has filed a Complaint for Forfeiture claiming that the car was used to facilitate the illegal sale of a controlled drug and that the car should, therefore, be forfeited to the United States. 21 U.S.C. § 881. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1355.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. No. 74-126
  16. In Re Tyco Intern., Ltd. Multidistrict Litigation (2007)

    Lead Plaintiffs[1] brought this class action against Tyco International, Ltd. ("Tyco"), its former auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP ("PwC"), and five individual defendants: former Tyco Chief Executive Officer L. Dennis Kozlowski, former Chief Financial Officer Mark H. Swartz, former General Counsel Mark A. Belnick, and former directors Frank L. Walsh and Michael A. Ashcroft (collectively the "Individual Tyco Defendants"). They successfully negotiated a proposed settlement with Tyco and PwC, [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Case No. 02-md-1335-PB
  17. Hagenbuch v. Snap-On Tools Corp. (1972)

    Plaintiff Richard P. Hagenbuch brings this action for damages for personal injuries resulting from a hammer chip striking him in the left eye. He alleges breach of implied and express warranties, negligence, and strict liability in tort. His wife, Joan Hagenbuch, seeks damages for loss of consortium. Defendant Snap-On Tools Corporation was the seller of the hammer, and defendant Houdaille Industries, Inc. through its subsidiary, Fairmount, was the manufacturer of the hammer which the plaintiff [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Civ. A. Nos. 3150, 3151
  18. United States v. Shea (1997)

    Two men wearing masks and gloves broke into the Londonderry, branch of the First New Hampshire Bank about an hour after closing on August 4, 1995. One of the robbers apparently cut himself when he entered the building, as bloodstains were discovered inside the bank and in a stolen minivan believed to have been used as a getaway vehicle.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: Criminal No. 96-12-01-B
  19. United States v. Ottati & Goss, Inc. (1985)

    Richard V. Wiebusch, U.S. Atty., Concord, N.H., William D. Evans, Jr., Land & Natural Resources Div., Sheila D. Jones, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., E. Michael Thomas, Office of Regional Counsel, Philip R. Boxell, Asst. Regional Counsel —USEPA, Boston, Mass., for the U.S.


    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: C80-225-L
  20. Town of Hooksett School Dist. v. WR Grace and Co. (1984)

    This diversity action is brought by the Town of Hooksett School District against W.R. Grace and Company, a foreign corporation, which sold and installed asbestos products in one of the Plaintiff's schools. Plaintiff seeks a judgment of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) alleging harm to its physical property and breach of warranty arising from the sale and installation of unreasonably dangerous asbestos products by the Defendant in 1958. Furthermore, Plaintiff seeks an award [...]

    Court: District Court for the District of New Hampshire Docket: C 83-761-L

1 of 46 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5