Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Court Cases

Search
  1. United States v. Magallanez (2005)

    This case presents yet another factual variation in the stream of Booker-related cases coming to this Court on plain error review. The defendant, Pete Magallanez, was convicted by a jury for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and to distribute, methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). On special interrogatory, the jury attributed 50-500 grams of methamphetamine to him. At sentencing, however, the district court found 1200 grams of [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 04-8021
  2. Kevin K. Ogden v. San Juan County (1994)

    Plaintiff-appellant Kevin K. Ogden, proceeding pro se, filed a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action on July 11, 1990, against San Juan County, the Farmington Police Department, the Aztec Detention Center, Johnny Bird, the Las Vegas Medical Center and the State of New Mexico. He alleged violations of his constitutional rights arising from his arrest by the Farmington police and his subsequent treatment for a variety of alleged physical and mental maladies while in custody of the Aztec Detention [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 94-2027
  3. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-Lazo (1988)

    Defendants Jose Guzman and Sonia Cruz-Lazo were each charged with one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The district court granted defendants' motion to suppress evidence uncovered when their car was stopped. The United States appeals, and we remand for further proceedings.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 87-2325
  4. In Re Cline (2008)

    Timothy Jay Cline, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, has filed a motion for remand challenging the transfer to this court of a post-conviction motion he filed in district court seeking dismissal of his indictment. We conclude that the district court correctly ruled that the claims in his motion constituted second or successive 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 claims, for which circuit court authorization is required in order to be filed. We deny the motion for remand, dismiss the matter, and warn Mr. Cline [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 08-3113
  5. United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton (1998)

    Michael G. Christensen, Assistant United States Attorney (Jackie N. Williams, United States Attorney, with him on the brief), Wichita, Kansas, for Plaintiff-Appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 97-3178
  6. United States v. Donald B.W. Evans v. Dominic Evans v. James E. Joubert (1992)

    This case involves an elaborate drug distribution network in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Five defendants were convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute "crack" cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. They were sentenced to long-term imprisonment pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 90-5186
  7. United States v. Pamela Jones (1995)

    Mark Scott, Pamela Jones and Katresa Johnson appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1), and for possession with intent to distribute over 200 kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2. We affirm the conspiracy and possession convictions of Mr. Scott and Ms. Jones and reverse the convictions of Ms. Johnson.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 93-8022
  8. United States v. Harry Jarmar Gordon (1993)

    Defendant Harry Jarmar Gordon was indicted on sixteen counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C); 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2, and one count of aiding and abetting the manufacture of a controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2. In exchange for the dismissal of all other counts, Defendant pleaded guilty to count twelve of the indictment--aiding and abetting the distribution of a controlled [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 92-4151
  9. United States v. Jaime Soto (1993)

    Defendant Jaime Soto appeals his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. Most issues on appeal arise out of the denial of defendant's motion to suppress cocaine found in a search of the automobile defendant was driving after he was stopped for a traffic violation. They raise nearly every difficult problem of standing, right to question, consent, and search possible in an automobile stop and search context. [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 91-4213
  10. Clyde Conaway v. Edward C. Smith (1988)

    Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against defendants-appellees claiming they had violated his First Amendment right to free speech and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process by wrongfully discharging him from public employment. Defendants thereafter filed a motion for summary judgment, which the district court granted. Plaintiff appeals this judgment and argues that genuine issues of material fact exist as to his liberty and property interest due process claims and as to his [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 85-2914
  11. Fogle v. Pierson (2006)

    COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Submitted on the briefs:* Ronald Jennings Fogle, filed a brief pro se.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 05-1405
  12. Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation (1991)

    Fredrick E. Sherman (Christopher P. Hall and Jonathan D. Schwartz of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, New York City, Blair J. Trautwein and Michael Rosenthal of Hathaway, Speight, Kunz, Trautwein & Barrett, Cheyenne, Wyo., with him on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 90-8051
  13. 63 Fair empl. prac. cas. (Bna) 1045 v. Longmont United Hospital Association (1994)

    Sharon Cone appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Longmont United Hospital, 797 F.Supp. 868. Alleging she suffered age discrimination because of disparate treatment under Longmont United Hospital's leave of absence policy, Ms. Cone brought this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C.A. Secs. 621-631. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1291 and affirm.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 92-1349
  14. Patricia M. Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1988)

    Joseph F. Glass of Best, Sharp, Thomas, Glass & Atkinson (Joseph A. Sharp; and Jody R. Nathan of Thomas, Glass, Atkins, Haskins, Nellis & Boudreaux, with him on the brief), Tulsa, Okl., for defendant-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 86-1427
  15. United States v. John A. Voss v. Mitchell S. Beals v. Brent L. Beals (1996)

    Warren R. Williamson, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant Mitchell Beals.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 94-1320
  16. 40 soc. sec. rep. ser. 117 v. Secretary of Health (1993)

    Don J. Svet, U.S. Atty., Gayla Fuller, Chief Counsel, Region IV, and Christopher Carillo, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 92-2017
  17. Servants of the v. St. Paul Fire (2000)

    Appellant, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("St Paul"), appeals from the district court's denial of two Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions and its denial of a motion to reconsider the denial of the first Rule 60(b) motion. St. Paul argues that the district court abused its discretion (1) in denying its first Rule 60(b) motion because this circuit favors the preservation of the right to appeal, and (2) in denying its second Rule 60(b) motion because the underlying declaratory [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 98-2258
  18. United States v. Robert L. Johnson (1992)

    The defendant-appellant Robert Johnson was charged in a sixty-three count indictment with various violations of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 & 1957). A jury found him guilty on all but one count. Appellant was sentenced by the district court to 405 months imprisonment. On appeal, Johnson raises several challenges to the propriety of the convictions and the sentence.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 91-5030
  19. United States v. Lewis Theodore Wacker v. Leroy Allen Cooley v. John Lee Wacker (1996)

    James P. Moran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Denver, Colorado (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, with him on the brief), for Defendant/Appellant Edith Faye Wacker.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 94-3007
  20. Clark Davenport Snell Sharon Ruth Snell v. Conley Tunnell Lissa Vernon Mary Asbury the Honorable Sidney D. Brown (1990)

    David A. Brown, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Charles Lee Waters, Gen. Counsel, Roger Stuart and Richard L. Freeman, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, with him on the brief), Legal Div., Dept. of Human Services, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants-appellants.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 88-2879

5 of 2555 Page(s)