Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Court Cases

Search
  1. United States v. Miguel Sandoval (1994)

    Miguel Sandoval ("Sandoval") was indicted for possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). Sandoval filed a motion to suppress the evidence of the cocaine itself on the ground that it had been obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. After an evidentiary hearing the district court denied that motion (829 F.Supp. 355 (D. Utah 1993), cited "Opinion at ----").1 Sandoval then entered a guilty plea conditioned on [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 93-4226
  2. Bradshaw v. Story (1996)

    Bradshaw is a prisoner in the United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum, Florence, Colorado. He is serving a sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. He brought this action under § 2241 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, arguing the court used unconstitutional Florida convictions to enhance his federal sentence. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, who recommended dismissal. [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 96-1006
  3. David J. Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust (1993)

    William C. Waller, Jr. (Denis H. Mark and Robert M. Vinton with him, on the briefs) of Vinton, Waller, Slivka & Panasci, Denver, CO, for defendant-appellant/cross-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 92-1209
  4. Gibson v. Klinger (2000)

    James F. Kelly, Assistant Attorney General (W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, with him on the brief), Office of the Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Respondent-Appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 99-5071
  5. 49 soc. sec. rep. ser. 246 v. Shirley S. Chater (1995)

    Stephen C. Lewis, United States Attorney, Joseph B. Liken, Acting Chief Counsel, Tina M. Waddell, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel, Christopher Carillo, Lead Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Dallas, Texas, for Defendant-Appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 95-5040
  6. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon (1994)

    State Farm Fire & Casualty Company sought and received in federal district court a declaration that it had no obligation to insure or defend Robert Mhoon, one of its policyholders, in a state tort action. We are now called upon to review the district court's decision to exercise jurisdiction over State Farm's claim, and its ultimate disposition of that claim on the merits. We do so and affirm.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 93-2103
  7. Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States (1991)

    Petitioner-appellant appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition, in which he claims that his perjury conviction is constitutionally invalid due to ineffective assistance of counsel caused by an actual and simultaneous conflict of interest. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 91-7083
  8. Scott Wolf v. Prudential Insurance Company of America (1995)

    Plaintiffs Scott and Brenda Wolf brought this action against defendant Annuity Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc. and defendant-appellee Prudential1 asserting claims related to defendants' denial of coverage for breast cancer treatment under a medical benefits plan sponsored by the Annuity Board and administered by Prudential. The Wolfs initially brought claims for breach of contract and specific performance against both the Annuity Board and Prudential and a claim for breach [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 94-5140
  9. Garrett v. Selby, Conner (2005)

    Pro se Plaintiff Delmer Garrett appeals the dismissal of his claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, 1962, and 1964, against the law firm of Selby, Conner, Maddux & Janer and several individual attorneys. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm1.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 04-5187
  10. James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan (1991)

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 90-3246
  11. Perkins v. Kansas Department of (1999)

    Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner who is HIV positive,1 appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action2 seeking redress for (1) being required to wear a face mask whenever he leaves his cell; (2) being denied all outdoor exercise for more than nine months; and (3) being denied treatment for his serious medical condition. The district court granted plaintiff leave to proceed informa pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Thereafter, the court sua sponte dismissed the [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 98-3005
  12. Sutton v. Utah State School (1999)

    Plaintiff-appellant, Kathi Sutton, on behalf of her minor son, James Sutton, brought the present action against defendants, Utah State School for the Deaf and Blind and Dwight Moore, its principal, in the Third District Court, State of Utah, in September 1996. An amended complaint was filed in October 1996 which expanded the plaintiff's claims to allege a federal civil rights violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as state law claims of negligence, breach of contract and [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 97-4019
  13. Marsh v. Soares (2000)

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO (D.C. No. 00-Z-54)Submitted on the briefs:*


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 00-1141
  14. United States v. Calderon (2005)

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 05-4011
  15. Lennox v. Evans (1996)

    This matter is before the court on Petitioner Steven Lennox's application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because we determine that Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right as required by the recently enacted Antiterrorist and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, we deny Petitioner's application and dismiss the appeal.

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 96-6041
  16. Donald G. Hargis v. Louis W. Sullivan (1991)

    Rodney A. Johnson, Asst. Regional Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Dallas, Tex. (Timothy D. Leonard, U.S. Atty., and Eleanor Darden Thompson, Asst. U.S. Atty., W.D. Okl., Gayla Fuller, Chief Counsel, and Karen J. Sharp, Chief, Social Sec. Branch, Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Dallas, Tex., with him on the brief), for defendant-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 90-6188
  17. United States v. Smart (2008)

    Christopher Wayne Smart was convicted of inducing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing videotapes depicting such conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Exercising its discretion under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Smart's sentencing court concluded that his United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") range of 168 to 210 months' imprisonment overstated the seriousness of his offense, and varied [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 06-6120
  18. Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan (1993)

    John W. Raley, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D. of Oklahoma, Gayla Fuller, Chief Counsel, Region VI, and Rodney A. Johnson, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of H.H.S., Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 92-7090
  19. United States v. Carlos Botero-Ospina (1995)

    Scott M. Matheson, Jr., United States Attorney (David J. Schwendiman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Bruce C. Lubeck, Assistant U.S. Attorney, with him on the briefs), Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 94-4006
  20. United States v. Cockerham (2001)

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. (D.C. No. 98-CV-158-B & 95-CR-49-B) Howard A. Pincus, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Docket: 98-7189

2 of 2555 Page(s)