Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court Cases

Search
  1. Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration (1995)

    Ghaly petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's (Board) decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction over this timely petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). The petition is denied.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 93-70926
  2. Kamla Prasad Meena v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)

    Kamla Prasad, Meena Kumari Prasad and their three children, ethnic Indian citizens of Fiji, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Board concluded that the Prasads failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of their race, religion, or political opinion. We have jurisdiction over this timely [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 94-70132
  3. United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline (2005)

    Michael R. Dreeben, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Michael A. Rotker, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Div., Appellate Sec., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 02-30326
  4. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire (1989)

    Peter Abrahams and Kathy L. Eldredge, Horvitz, Levy & Amerian, Encino, Cal., William D. Hughes, Hughes & Campbell, San Diego, Cal., Jon A. Kodani, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 88-5951
  5. Silaya v. Mukasey (2008)

    Stacy Tolchin, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Marc Van Der Hout, Christine Brigagliano, and Stacey L. Gartland, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 06-73822
  6. Max Lopez, Jr. v. G.A. Smith (2000)

    Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge, and Joseph T. Sneed, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Stephen S. Trott, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins, A. Wallace Tashima, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 97-16987
  7. Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer Wade (2000)

    Under Sandin, a prisoner possesses a liberty interest under the federal constitution when a change occurs in confinement that imposes an "atypical and significant hardship . . . in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life." 515 U.S. at 484. In this case, Plaintiff has failed to establish a liberty interest protected by the Constitution. That is so because Plaintiff has not alleged that his confinement, whether administrative or [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 98-15704
  8. Katuria E. Smith Angela Rock Michael Pyle v. Tyson Marsh Robin Wilt Adriana Maestas Bridget Lokelani Slavens Buffy Jo Christina Wicks Troy A. Hutson Sonia M. Rodriguez Elaine B. Gin Andrew Langham Elizabeth M. Adamitis Peter Michael MacDonald Tracey J. March Alice M. Ostdiek (1999)

    Mark D. Rosenbaum (argued), Daniel P. Tokaji, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Steven Shapiro, ACLU Foundation, New York, New York; Lucy Lee Helm, W. Ward Morrison, Jr., Graham & James; RiddellWilliams, Seattle, Washington, for the proposed intervenors-appellants.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 98-35732
  9. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann Jansen (1995)

    Plaintiff William Earl Warren III appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, the City of Carlsbad and city employees (collectively "the City"), and the district court's grant of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions against him and Thomas Gill, an attorney (not of record) who helped him with the case. Warren alleges that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq., by not promoting him to the position of fire [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 93-55749
  10. Valentina A. Nagoulko v. Immigration (2003)

    Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division; Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director; and Margaret Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 02-70467
  11. Jan Acewicz v. U.S. Immigration v. U.S. Immigration v. U.S. Immigration (1993)

    Each of these eight cases involves a Polish alien who seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. In each case, the BIA affirmed the immigration judge's denial of the alien's application for asylum, under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a), and for withholding of deportation, under 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h). The BIA entered final orders of deportation against each petitioner. We have jurisdiction to review those deportation orders pursuant to section 106 of the Immigration [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 91-70402
  12. Julio Cesar Berroteran-Melendez v. Immigration (1992)

    Julio Cesar Berroteran-Melendez, his wife Ruth, and their two children (collectively "petitioners") petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision denying their request for asylum and withholding of deportation.1


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 90-70327
  13. School District No. 1j v. Acands v. Acands v. Acands v. Acands (1993)

    Ronald Scott Bemis, Stafford, Frey, Cooper and Stewart, Seattle, WA, and Christopher A. Rycewicz, Stafford, Frey, Cooper & Stewart, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Fibreboard.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 92-35127
  14. Henri Bagdadi v. Jose Nazar Hispanic-American Educational Materials (1996)

    James C. Potepan, Cooper, Kardaras & Scharf, Pasadena, California, for defendant-appellees Nazar, Hispanic American Educational Materials, Inc., d.b.a Lexicon School of Languages: ISB of America, Inc., ISB of Texas, Inc., Lexicon Institute, Inc., Lexicon Sales Corp., Lexicon Service Corp.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 94-56588
  15. Najmabadi v. Holder (2010)

    Peter D. Keisler, Linda S. Wernery, and Angela N. Liang, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for respondent, Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 05-72401
  16. Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department Daryl E. Gates City of Los Angeles Tom Bradley Sid Mills Byron E. Young Henry T. Knopp Robert Robles Dean Blidterfeldt M.F. Lords Tester Obrymski Agapito Ramirez Robert G. Gandy Tom Knoff (1988)

    On May 16, 1983, Karim-Panahi was arrested on misdemeanor charges of trespassing, Cal.Penal Code Sec. 602(l), and resisting or obstructing a police officer in the performance of his or her duties, Cal. Penal Code Sec. 148. The arresting officers transported Karim-Panahi to a jail facility, where he was booked and subjected to a strip search and a body cavity search.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 86-6198
  17. Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey (2008)

    Santos-Lemus petitions from the dismissal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) of his appeal from an immigration judge's (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 07-70604
  18. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 242 v. Immigration (1997)

    Baljinder Singh Sangha, an Indian national, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"). The BIA found that Sangha failed to show that he was persecuted on account of his political opinion. The BIA had jurisdiction under 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(b)(2), 242.21. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). The petition is denied.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 95-70427
  19. John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr. (1992)

    John McGuckin, an Arizona state prisoner, brought a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against several prison medical authorities at the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) and Dr. John C. Medlen, a private orthopedic specialist who does consulting work for the ADOC. McGuckin alleged that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The district court dismissed without prejudice his claims against defendants Dr. Dimitri Catsaros and Ron Buttram, and [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 90-16651
  20. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen (1990)

    Jena Balistreri appeals, pro se, the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. The district court's decision is published at 656 F.Supp. 423. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Docket: 87-1969

2 of 5657 Page(s)