Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court Cases

Search
  1. Cynthia King v. United States Department of Justice (1987)

    Charles J. Sheehan, Dept. of Justice, of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, pro hac vice, by special leave of the Court, with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Royce C. Lamberth and R. Craig Lawrence, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 84-5098
  2. Wisconsin Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1985)

    Bolivar C. Andrews, Cheryl Foley, James W. McCartney, Judy M. Johnson, Houston, Tex., and David T. Andril, Washington, D.C., were on motion for partial stay filed by petitioner Transwestern Pipeline Co.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 84-1489
  3. Sierra Club v. EPA (2002)

    G. Scott Williams, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John C. Cruden, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and Alan Carpien, Attorney, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 01-1057
  4. Holy Land Fdn Devel v. Ashcroft, John (2003)

    Douglas Letter, Terrorism Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., U.S. Attorney, H. Thomas Byron III, and Elizabeth J. Shapiro, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, and David D. Aufhauser, General Counsel, U.S. Department of Treasury.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 02-5307
  5. Campbell, James v. DOJ (1998)

    United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 19, 1998 Decided December 29, 1998 No. 97-5269 James Campbell, Appellant v. United States Department of Justice, Appellee Appeal from the United States [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 97-5269
  6. Julius Hobson v. Jerry Wilson v. Jerry Wilson Charles D. Brennan (1984)

    Richard B. Nettler, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C. (at the time the brief was filed), Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and Edward S. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants, Wilson, et al., in Nos. 82-2159 and 82-2221 and appellees in Nos. 82-2226 and 82-2227.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 82-2159
  7. William Hohri v. United States (1986)

    Jeffrey Axelrad, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 84-5460
  8. James Walker v. Walter E. Washington (1980)

    Richard W. Barton, Deputy Corp. Counsel and Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the motion of appellees for summary affirmance. Judith W. Rogers, Washington, D. C., Atty., entered an appearance for appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 79-2411
  9. Nathan L. Drew v. United States (1964)

    Mr. Robert A. Levetown, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and Barry Sidman, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 17611
  10. Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, Alberto (2006)

    Lisa S. Goldfluss, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief were Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney, and Michael J. Ryan, Assistant U.S. Attorney. R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, entered an appearance.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 04-5278
  11. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission (1958)

    Messrs. Willard W. Gatchell, General Counsel, Federal Power Commission, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, Federal Power Commission, and Robert L. Russell, Assistant General Counsel, Federal Power Commission, for respondent in No. 14,583 and appellee in No. 14,584.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 14584
  12. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson (1980)

    The defendants appeal the denial of their motions to permit an answer out of time and to set aside the entry of a default judgment against them. The district court considered the negligent failure to file a timely answer unjustifiable and attributed the negligence of the lawyer to the defendants themselves. Because strong policies favor the resolution of genuine disputes on their merits, negligence of a lawyer is not always imputed to his clients on a motion to set aside the entry of a [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 79-1861
  13. Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, Mayor (1994)

    Vanessa Ruiz, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Karen L. McDonald, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellees.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 93-7126
  14. Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission (1971)

    COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Mr. Anthony Z. Roisman, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Myron M. Cherry, Chicago, Ill., and Lewis Drain, Grand Rapids, Mich., were on the brief, for petitioners.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 24871
  15. Wilbur, Robert v. CIA (2004)

    Appellant Robert Wilbur appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Wilbur v. CIA, 273 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003). Wilbur brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 et seq., seeking information pertaining to himself. The district court correctly held that the CIA satisfied its obligation under the FOIA to search for records responsive to Wilbur's request. Accordingly, we affirm the [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 03-5142
  16. Sussman v. US Marshals Service (2007)

    Alan Burch, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Jeffrey A. Taylor, U.S. Attorney, and R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney. Laurie Weinstein and Michael J. Ryan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, entered appearances.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 06-5085
  17. Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1997)

    Marina Utgoff Braswell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellees. With her on the brief was Mary Lou Leary, U.S. Attorney, and R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney. John D. Bates, Assistant U.S. Attorney, entered an appearance.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 96-5267
  18. United States v. Harry R. Haldeman v. John D. Ehrlichman v. John N. Mitchell (1977)

    John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., with whom Frank H. Strickler, Ross O'Donoghue, and George A. Fisher (at the time the case was argued), Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant in No. 75-1381. Messrs. Strickler and O'Donoghue were on the brief for appellant Haldeman in No. 76-1441.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 75-1384
  19. John Davis v. United States Department of Justice (1992)

    Douglas Letter, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant. John D. Bates, R. Craig Lawrence, and Susan A. Nellor, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellant.


    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 91-5209
  20. Curley v. United States (1947)

    Appellants were indicted for violation of the mail fraud statute[1] and for conspiracy to violate that statute.[2] Trial was had before a jury. At the conclusion of the case for the prosecution, the defendants moved for directed verdicts of acquittal. The court denied the motions. Defendants Curley and Fuller stood on the motions and offered no evidence. Defendant Smith presented eight character witnesses and proffered certain documentary evidence. These three defendants were convicted on the [...]

    Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Docket: 9208, 9209, No. 9215

4 of 1270 Page(s)