Board of Veterans' Appeals Court Cases

Search
  1. 12-08 719 (2015)

    The Veteran had active service in the United States Army from October 1966 to May 1969; he served in Vietnam and was awarded the Purple Heart Medal. The Veteran subsequently served on active duty in the Army from March 1971 to August 1988, when he retired. The Veteran died in April 2010. The appellant is seeking benefits as the Veteran's surviving spouse.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 12-08 719
  2. 10-10 091 (2015)

    In connection with his claim, the Veteran testified before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge (VLJ) at a Travel Board hearing at the RO in June 2013. A copy of the transcript is associated with the physical claims file.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 10-10 091
  3. 10-26 966 (2015)

    This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a January 2010 rating decision by a Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These matters were remanded in March 2014 and October 2014 for further development.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 10-26 966
  4. 00-02 049 (2015)

    This appeal comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from an August 2013 Order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims (Veterans Court). The appeal originated from a July 1998 rating decision of the RO in Columbia, South Carolina.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 00-02 049
  5. 09-42 603 (2014)

    These claims were remanded in January 2014 for additional development. He was awarded a separate rating of 20 percent for his right ankle, effective from June 16, 2008, following this remand, which he has not appealed. The purposes of the development have been met with regard to his increased rating claim; however, still further development is required before his service connection claim may be adjudicated on its merits. Therefore, the issue of entitlement to service connection for a [...]

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 09-42 603
  6. 12-28 339 (2014)

    In light of the decision to grant service connection for bilateral hearing loss, VA's duties to notify and assist are deemed fully satisfied and there is no prejudice to the Veteran in proceeding to decide the issue on appeal. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5103, 5103A, 5107; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.159.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 12-28 339
  7. 10-40 587 (2015)

    The Veteran served on active duty from March 1948 to February 1955, and had subsequent active duty for training. These matters are before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from April 2009 (right knee) and December 2013 (left knee) rating decisions of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). In May 2010, the Veteran testified before a Decision Review Officer (DRO). In April 2015, a videoconference hearing was held before the undersigned. Transcripts from [...]

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 10-40 587
  8. 10-31 016 (2014)

    The case was remanded in December 2012 to provide the Veteran with notice of how VA assigns effective dates. Review of the record indicates substantial compliance. See Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268, 271 (1998).

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 10-31 016
  9. 12-13 264 (2015)

    This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2011 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Cleveland, Ohio. The Veteran's appeal was previously before the Board in February 2013, and October 2014.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 12-13 264
  10. 07-39 989 (2015)

    This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a June 2007 administration decision issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Indianapolis, Indiana.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 07-39 989
  11. 07-07 436 (2011)

    This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from rating decisions dated in August 2005 and December 2007 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Portland, Oregon. The August 2005 rating decision denied service connection for left ankle disability. The December 2007 rating decision denied service connection for disability due to sexually transmitted disease and its residuals.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 07-07 436
  12. 11-12 667 (2014)

    This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a July 2010 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Jurisdiction over the case was subsequently transferred to the RO in Phoenix, Arizona.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 11-12 667
  13. 09-12 283 (2015)

    The Veteran testified before a Veterans Law Judge at a Travel Board hearing in September 2012. That Judge has since retired and is no longer at the Board. However, in light of the death of the Veteran and dismissal of the appeal, no further action is required.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 09-12 283
  14. 12-21 286 (2015)

    This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a May 2010 rating decision of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) that, in pertinent part, denied on the merits the Veteran's previously denied claim of entitlement to a low back disability.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 12-21 286
  15. 03-21 605 (2014)

    The Veteran had active service from March 1985 until August 1992. Given that the medical evidence shows that the Veteran has been in a persistent vegetative state since December 2012, he has been declared incompetent, a fiduciary has been appointed, and she is serving as the appellant.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 03-21 605
  16. 06-31 853 (2011)

    This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a January 2006 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO), which denied an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the Veteran's left foot disability. The Veteran timely appealed that issue.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 06-31 853
  17. 09-16 955 (2015)

    This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a November 2007 rating decision from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Newark, New Jersey. During the course of his appeal, the RO increased the Veteran's rating from 10 percent to 30 percent with an effective date of March 17, 2009. As this increase does not constitute a full grant of the benefit sought, the Board concludes that the initial rating issue remains on appeal. AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. [...]

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 09-16 955
  18. 08-13 677 (2015)

    This matter come before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from October 2007 and February 2014 rating decisions by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which denied entitlement to TDIU.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 08-13 677
  19. 08-25 886 (2014)

    This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an October 2005 rating decision issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Montgomery, Alabama.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 08-25 886
  20. 03-27 997 (2015)

    1. Entitlement to presumptive service connection for diabetes mellitus with end stage renal disease, diabetic retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic gastroparesis and coronary artery disease, to include as due to herbicide exposure, for substitution purposes.

    Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Docket: 03-27 997

1 of 85 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5