Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Court Cases

Search
  1. In Re Matthews (1995)

    This matter is before the Court on the complaint of the Plaintiffs/Debtors, the Matthews (the "Debtors," the "Plaintiffs" or the "Matthews"), against the United States (the "Internal Revenue Service" or the "IRS"),[1] for civil contempt, for damages for violation of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h), for violation of the discharge injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 524(a), for injunctive relief and for relief under 5 U.S.C. § 504. This court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 92-10939-MAM-7. Adv. No. 94-1269
  2. In Re BNW, Inc. (1996)

    This matter is before the Court on the Complaint of the Plaintiff, Kathryn T. Carter, and Intervenor, Lonnie L. Mixon, Trustee, seeking relief from the actions of the Defendant, The Peoples Bank and Trust Company. As to the issues raised in the adversary case and the relief from stay motion as they relate to BNW, Inc., the Court has no subject matter jurisdiction to take any of the requested actions as the property at issue is not property of BNW's estate under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(e). As to the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 93-10173-MAM-11, Adv. No. 95-1256
  3. In Re Griner (1999)

    This matter came before the Court on the trial of the complaint of The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Inc. and Crawford & Company, Inc. for a permanent injunction. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and the Court has the authority to enter a final order. For the reasons indicated below, the complaint of The Travelers [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 98-13697-MAM-13. Adversary No. 99-1030
  4. In Re Noletto (2000)

    These matters are all class action suits against the named defendants for alleged violations of federal bankruptcy law. Plaintiffs request that each suit be certified as a nationwide class. Each complaint consists of the following four counts:


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 98-13813-MAM-13, 97-12807-MAM-13, 96-14029-MAM-13, 98-10935-MAM-13, 97-10511-MAM-13, 98-14378-MAM-13, Adversary Nos. 99-1120, 99-1137, 99-1144, 99-1121, 99-1124, 99-1136
  5. In Re Davis (1996)

    This case is before the Court on the Complaint of James and Deanna Davis (Debtors or the Davises) against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS or Government)[1] for violation of the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(h). The Court has jurisdiction to hear the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). For the reasons indicated below, the Court is awarding a judgment to the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 95-12357-MAM-7, Adv. No. 96-1001
  6. In Re Kennedy (1995)

    This matter is before the Court on Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy's ("Kennedys" or "Debtors") request for confirmation of their Chapter 13 plan. Pearl Finance Co. n/k/a Carmel Investments, Inc. ("Pearl" or "Pearl Finance") objects. This is a matter over which this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L). For the reasons given below, the plan, if modified as indicated, will be [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 94-11752-MAM-13
  7. In Re Powe (2002)

    This matter came before the Court for trial the week of December 10, 2001. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and the Court has the authority to enter a final order. For the reasons indicated below, the Court is granting a judgment in favor of the defendant, Chrysler Financial Corporation, L.L.C.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 98-10935-MAM-13, 98-13377-WSS-13. Adversary No. 99-1121
  8. In Re Brooks (1994)

    The Plaintiff in this adversary proceeding, Oscar Huff, has filed a Notice of Appeal and an Amended Notice seeking reversal of this Court's order declaring dischargeable any debt owed to him by Jesse Brooks pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).[1] Mr. Huff has filed a motion seeking leave to appeal in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in conjunction with his appeal. In the motion, he seeks to file his appeal without a filing fee and to obtain a copy of the transcript of the pretrial [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 93-10447-MAM. Adv. No. 94-1105
  9. In Re McKinney (1994)

    This matter is before the Court upon the motion of Jim Walter Homes, Inc., for relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 in order to obtain possession of real estate. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G). Proper notice of the hearing was given and appearances were as noted in the record.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 94-11460-MAM-13
  10. In Re Caffey (2008)

    Before the Court is Plaintiff/Debtor's adversary case against Karen Russell for an injunction against enforcement of certain orders of the state court and for damages for Defendant's violation of the automatic stay. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and the Court has authority to enter a final order. For the reasons indicated [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 07-12132. Adversary No. 07-01091
  11. In Re Leon's Casuals Co., Inc. (1990)

    This matter came on for hearing on motion of Selma Community Builders, Incorporated, Movant, for payment of an administrative expense by the Debtor, Leon's Casuals Company, Incorporated. Appearing were Irvin Grodsky, Attorney for the Debtor, and Robert R. Blair, Attorney for the Movant. After due deliberation on counsels' arguments, stipulations of fact, and briefs subsequently filed, the Court concludes and orders as follows:


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 89-01519
  12. In Re Port Royal Land & Timber Co. (1989)

    This matter came on for hearing on the "Application of Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner, Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor In Possession, for Final Allowance of Compensation for Services Rendered Through February 3, 1989, and for Reimbursement of Disbursements."


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 86-00783
  13. In Re Rayborn (2002)

    This case is before the Court on the motion of Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC) to reconsider and set aside the Court's January 10, 2002 order reducing and allowing FMCC's Claim No. 10 to $12,968.20 and ordering a $2,337.27 refund to the chapter 13 trustee. This Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and this Court has the authority to enter a [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 98-12083
  14. In Re Peterson (2001)

    This matter is before the Court on the Trustee's objection to exemptions. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and the Court has the authority to enter a final order. For the reasons indicated below, the Court is sustaining the objection of the Trustee to Debtor's exemptions except as to one watch.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 01-11274
  15. In Re Poffenbarger (2002)

    ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OF FUNDS, DENYING DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS FEES OUT OF PAST DUE ALIMONY, DENYING MOTION TO CLAIM AS EXEMPT PAST DUE ALIMONY, MOOTING MOTION TO CLAIM AS EXEMPT PAST DUE AND FUTURE CHILD SUPPORT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR TURNOVER


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 01-16096
  16. In Re Pigott (2005)

    This case is before this court on the objection to exemptions filed by the United States in the Pigotts' case. The Government objects to the debtors' exemption of a 2004 federal tax refund of $5,125. This court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § § 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) and the court has the authority to enter a final order. For the reasons indicated below, the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 05-10327-MAM-7
  17. In Re Rivera (2001)

    This case is before the Court on the motion of the debtor, Tonette Rivera, to hold Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (Nissan) in contempt and Nissan's motion to dismiss the contempt motion for failure to state a claim. This Court has jurisdiction to hear these matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. These matters are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) and the Court has the authority to enter a final order. For the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 00-12352-MAM-13
  18. In Re Scudder (1989)

    This matter came before the Court on the Objection of the Trustee to the Debtor's claimed exemptions. Appearing were Irvin Grodsky, attorney for the Debtor, and Theodore L. Hall, Trustee and attorney for the Trustee. Having duly considered the evidence and arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: 88-01147
  19. In Re Powe (2001)

    This case is before the Court on four motions: (1) the Debtor's Motion to Strike Exhibits; (2) the Defendants Amended Motion to Strike Exhibits; (3) the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) the Debtor's Motion for Class Certification. The Court has jurisdiction to hear these matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. These matters are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) and the Court has the authority to enter a [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 98-10935-MAM-13, 98-13377-WSS-13. Adversary No. 99-1121
  20. In Re Grant (2000)

    This matter is before the Court on the motion of Conseco Finance Corp.-Alabama, f/d/b/a/ Green Tree Financial Corporation ("Conseco") to stay proceedings and to compel arbitration and Debtor's motion to determine that this adversary is a core proceeding. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157 and the Order of Reference of the District Court. At least to the extent indicated below, this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama Docket: Bankruptcy No. 99-13952-MAM-7. Adversary No. 00-1142

1 of 6 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5