Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Court Cases

Search
  1. In Re Fowler (2006)

    Before the Court is the Motion of the United States Trustee (the "UST") to Dismiss the chapter 7 case of Jean Fowler (the "Debtor") pursuant to section 707(b)(2) and (b)(3). The Debtor opposes the Motion. At the hearing on the Motion, the parties asked the Court to address the following discrete issue: whether the Debtor, for purposes of section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I), may take the ownership deduction specified in the IRS Local Transportation Expense Standards for a car she owns which is not [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 06-10207 (MFW)
  2. In Re AstroPower Liquidating Trust (2005)

    Eric Lopez Schnabel, Mark R. Ownes, Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, Wilmington, DE, Mark J. Kalla, Chris Lenhart, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN Kent Schmidt, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Irvine, CA, For Xantrex Technology Inc.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 04-10322 (MFW). Adversary No. 05-50867
  3. In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. (2001)

    Steven T. Davis, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for AGE Institute of Pennsylvania, Inc., AGE Institute of Massachusetts, Inc., AGE Institute of Florida, Inc., Delaware Valley Convalescent Homes, Inc., AGE Holdings, Inc. and Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 00-2692/JHW, 00-2494/JHW
  4. In Re Valley Media, Inc. (2003)

    David J. Baldwin, Elihu Ezekiel Allinson, III, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, Michael C. Hammer, Dawn R. Copley, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Borders, Inc., Defendant.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 01-11353 PJW, Adversary No. 02-2212
  5. In Re Oodc, LLC (2005)

    This matter is before the Court on various Motions to Dismiss (or for a More Definitive Statement) relating to two Complaints filed by the Trustee. The Motions are opposed by the Trustee. For reasons set forth below, we will deny the Motions.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 01-11322(WS). Adversary Nos. 03-58583(MFW), 02-2274 (MFW)
  6. In Re Fedders North America, Inc. (2009)

    Rachel B. Mersky, Esquire, Monzack Mersky McLaughlin & Browder, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Sharon L. Levine, Esquire, Lowenstein Sandler PC, Rosemand, NJ, Counsel to the Plaintiff, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 07-11176 (BLS). Adversary No. 08-50549 (BLS)
  7. In Re Haman (2007)

    Before the Court is the Motion of the United States Trustee ("UST") to Dismiss the chapter 7 case of Patricia Haman (the "Debtor") pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2) or, alternatively, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3) (the "Motion to Dismiss"). The Debtor opposes the Motion to Dismiss, conceding that the presumption of abuse has arisen pursuant to section 707(b)(2)(A) but asserting that the statutory presumption has been rebutted by her demonstration of a special circumstance justifying an [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 06-10857 (BLS)
  8. In Re Scott Acquisition Corp. (2006)

    Laura Davis Jones, Bruce Grohsgal, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones & Weintraub P.C., Wilmington, DE, Jeremy V. Richards, James K.T. Hunter, Jonathan J. Kim, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones & Weintraub P.C., Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 04-12594(PJW), Adversary No. 05-30112(PJW)
  9. In Re Ampace Corp. (2002)

    Before the court is the motion (Doc. # 13) of Comdata Network, Inc. f/k/a TIC Financial Systems ("Comdata" or "Defendant") for summary judgment. I will deny the motion for the reasons discussed below.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 98-2772(PJW), Adversary No. A-00-2033
  10. In Re Pennington (2006)

    Before the Court is the Motion of the United States Trustee (the "UST") to dismiss the chapter 7 case of Joseph Pennington, Jr. (the "Debtor") for abuse pursuant to section 707(b)(1) and (3) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Motion is opposed by the Debtor. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the Motion and dismiss the Debtor's case, unless he converts it to chapter 13.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 06-10066 (MFW)
  11. In Re Global Link Telecom Corp. (2005)

    Steven K. Kortanek, Esquire, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzberg & Ellers, LLP, Wilmington, DE, John Greco, Esquire, Betancourt, Van Hemmen, Greco & Kenyon, Red Bank, NJ, Counsel for Global Link Liquidating Trust.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 99-3923 (MFW), Adversary No. 01-07892
  12. In Re LaRoche Industries, Inc. (2004)

    Curtis J. Crowther, Esquire, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE, Edward J. Kosmowski, Esquire, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE, Joel A. Waite, Esquire, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 00-1859. Adversary No. 03-59023
  13. In Re Paret (2006)

    Before the Court is the Motion of the United States Trustee ("the UST") to dismiss the Debtor's chapter 7 case based upon the totality of the Debtor's financial circumstances. The Debtor opposes the motion. For the reasons outlined below, the Court concludes that the totality of the Debtor's financial circumstances (including the Debtor's ability to repay his debts) is the applicable standard. Having determined the legal standard, the Court will schedule an evidentiary hearing on that issue.[2]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 06-10272 (MFW)
  14. In Re PPI Enterprises (US), Inc. (1998)

    Laurie Selber Silverstein, William Hazeltine, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, David Boies, Andrew W. Hayes, Boies & Schiller LLP, Armonk, NY, for Sheldon H. Solow d/b/a Solow Building Company.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 96-539 (PJW), 96-540(PJW)
  15. In Re American Film Technologies, Inc. (1994)

    Francis A. Monaco, Jr., Joseph J. Bodnar, Walsh and Monzack, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Andrew M. White, Alisa M. Morgenthaler, T. Joshua Ritz, Christensen, White, Miller, Fink & Jacobs, Los Angeles, CA, for Joseph M. Taritero.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 93-1207. Adv. No. A-93-138
  16. In Re Zenith Electronics Corp. (1999)

    This case is before the Court on the request of Zenith Electronics Corporation ("Zenith") for approval of its Disclosure Statement and confirmation of its Pre-Packaged Plan of Reorganization filed August 24, 1999 ("the Plan"). The Plan is supported by Zenith's largest shareholder and creditor, LG Electronics, Inc. ("LGE"), and the holders of a majority of the debentures issued by Zenith pre-petition ("the Bondholders").[1] The Plan is opposed by the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 99-2911 (MFW)
  17. In Re Oakwood Homes Corp. (2006)

    Mark D. Collins, Russell C. Silberglied, Cynthia L. Collins, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, R. Paul Wickes, Mary K. Warren, Michael J. Osnato, Jr., J. Justin Williamson, New York, NY, for Credit Suisse First Boston.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy No. 02-13396 (PJW). Adversary No. 04-57060 (PJW)
  18. Matter of Rexene Products Co. (1992)

    Leonard N. Izzarelli and Donald J. Schelfhout, individually and as class representatives, seek relief from stay to prosecute a class action against Rexene Products Company and Rexene Corporation. For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED.


    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 91-1057, 91-1058, Motion No. 92-2
  19. In Re Wilson (2006)

    Before the Court is the Motion of the United States Trustee ("UST") to Dismiss the chapter 7 case of Celine Artie Wilson (the "Debtor") pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2) or, alternatively, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3) (the "Motion to Dismiss"). Following the November 16, 2006 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, only one discrete issue with regard to the UST's request for dismissal under section 707(b)(2) remains: namely, whether the Debtor, for purposes of section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I), may [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: 06-10834 (BLS)
  20. In Re Continental Airlines, Inc. (1999)

    Before the Court are two Motions, both of which require that we apply the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in this case. In re Continental Airlines, 125 F.3d 120 (3d Cir.1997). The first is the Motion of a group of Eastern pilots, the Labor Protective Provision Claimants ("the LPP Claimants"), to expunge the claims of certain other Eastern pilots ("the Other Eastern Pilots")[2] for failure to timely exercise their right to arbitration. The second is the Motion of the [...]

    Court: Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Docket: Bankruptcy Nos. 90-932 (MFW) to 90-984(MFW)

1 of 44 Page(s)

Page:
  1. 2
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5